Square Peg, Round Diet, and Other Ways I’ve Tried to Outsmart Myself
- David Johnson
- Feb 18
- 4 min read

If there’s one thing I’ve learned from my long and deeply committed relationship with “the next great diet,” it’s this: my taste buds and I are in a lifelong partnership, and every time I try to force them into an arranged marriage with a diet they hate, the whole thing ends in spectacular, hilarious failure.
Improving your nutrition is supposed to make your life better. And yet, somehow, we keep turning it into a reality show challenge called How Long Can I Pretend to Enjoy This? I’ve starred in several seasons of that show.
I am, by nature, a skeptical person. I question reviews. I read the fine print. I side-eye anything that promises miracles. Except when it comes to my health. Then I become the world’s most enthusiastic volunteer for nutritional experiments that start with the now-famous phrase: “But TikTok said…”
Enter the world’s greatest protein bar. According to a wildly enthusiastic creator on TikTok, this bar was not just food, it was a historic event. They danced. They nearly fainted mid-bite. The macros were described with the reverence usually reserved for rare art. I was told I could have blueberry pie, vanilla ice cream, and superhero-level protein in one convenient wrapper.
I ordered the big box, because of course I did. When it arrived, I opened it like a kid on Christmas morning and took a bite with absolute confidence. And what I tasted was not summer blueberries. Not pie. Not joy. I tasted immediate regret. The kind of regret that makes you briefly consider whether it’s socially acceptable to spit food back into the wrapper.
In fairness, protein bars and I have never been friends. Anything with exaggerated amounts of protein tends to taste like it should come with dosage instructions. But I keep trying to convince myself that this one will be different. It never is. That was lesson number one: no amount of marketing can turn a food you dislike into a sustainable daily habit.
Lesson number two arrived in the form of the carnivore diet. Now, I own shirts that literally say “Raised on Rice,” which should have been my first clue that eliminating carbs was going to be a bold and questionable move. For two weeks, I ate meat, eggs, and a small rotation of vegetables. It was fine. It was also deeply monotonous.
Then one day I walked into a grocery store and smelled fresh bread. What happened next is still a bit hazy. I bought a loaf and, in the parking lot, proceeded to eat it with the intensity of someone settling a personal score. I was three-quarters of the way through before I fully processed what I was doing. Carnivore and I officially parted ways right there, crumbs everywhere.
I’ve also done the hyper-intense six-week fitness challenge with the meal plan that revolved around fish. I am a selective fish eater, which is a polite way of saying I like very little fish. Unfortunately, the plan and I were locked in a recurring battle over tilapia. Every meal felt like trying to force a square peg into a round hole.
I did lose body fat. Mostly because I had unintentionally given up the action of eating. When the six weeks ended, I ate like someone who had just been released from a very polite food prison. That swing from restriction to rebellion taught me more than any macro chart ever could: if your plan requires you to white-knuckle your way through every meal, it’s not a plan you can live with.
And that’s really the heart of it. We trip up on our nutrition journeys when we try to outsource our preferences to someone else’s blueprint. Diets are often presented like strict rulebooks, but they work better as flexible guidelines. There is no nutrition referee waiting to blow a whistle because you swapped salmon for chicken or turned a meal into tacos because that’s what you actually enjoy eating.
The goal isn’t to win a short-term challenge. It’s to build a way of eating that feels normal enough to repeat on an ordinary Tuesday. That means experimenting. It means admitting that if you hate protein bars, you probably shouldn’t base your snack strategy around them. It means accepting that if bread is a meaningful part of your happiness, the solution isn’t to pretend it doesn’t exist.
Listening to your taste buds isn’t weakness; it’s strategy. You can find healthier versions of foods you love. You can celebrate the small wins: the stir-fry packed with vegetables you genuinely enjoy, the snack swap that actually satisfies you. Those moments matter because they stack up into habits you don’t have to fight.
I’ve made all the classic mistakes. I’ve chased shiny promises, forced down foods I disliked, and tried to out-discipline basic human preference. Now I mostly laugh about it. Because the lesson hiding inside all those misadventures is surprisingly simple and kind: you cannot force a square peg into a round hole when it comes to eating.
Your nutrition journey doesn’t need to be a battle. It can be a long, slightly messy, often funny conversation with yourself about what actually works. When you stop trying to live on foods that feel like punishment and start building meals around things you enjoy, the whole process softens. It becomes something you can stick with, not because you have superhuman willpower, but because it finally fits.
And that’s where the real progress lives: in a way of eating that feels less like a dare and more like coming home to a plate you’re genuinely happy to see.




Comments